This was the longest depiction of Mr. Turner that I've seen so far. I've seen some artist bibliographies, but haven't seen a narrative that deals with his life. It is a very good portrayal of his life. The central theme of the film is a little obscure, but one can speculate that it is the artists' status in society that is the main question of the film. Throughout the film it is up for discussion the place of the artist's place in society. He is undoubtably a great artist. Yet, the question remains what is his status over time? He had two mistresses and children by one, are we to judge the main ill because of his troubles with women?
Furthermore, is his choice of subject matter dull or uninspired? Do all of those oceanic crashes lose appeal over time? I think some of them are pinnacles of aritistic expression. They gave birth to the impressionist movement in France. Perhaps not wholely, but in part yes.
The film is an interesting portrait of Mr. Turner. It follows his life from young adulthood until death. We see how he made a living painting. He had a studio which he exhibited his works.
What is most interesting, perhaps, is his ventures to a vacation spot. He takes up temporary residence in a seaside resort and eventually takes a lover from the residence he lives in. They go on to live comfortably. He dies in the care of his mistress. Which is questionable. Then again Mr. Turner was not a swell looker, so perhaps it was all he could get. Let's not pass too harsh a judgement on him.
The film was interesting in it's techniques. The camera work was good, but not great. The editing was adequate, not innovative. It all worked to bring about a story of England's greatest painter of the 19th century. The story was interesting and held my attention for all of it's time. It was a credit to Mike Leigh and his record of film making.
No comments:
Post a Comment